Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Hamilton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Hamilton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:GNG and the subject is clearly not notable in any way. A search for notable work by this journalist produces an online bio that bears a striking resemblance to the material in this article, supporting the belief that it is written as an advertisement and has no encyclopedic content. Further, the article contains no WP:RS. Finally, nothing in this existing article meets criteria for WP:V and it is unlikely that a more comprehensive search will produce anything of importance. GhostDust (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was unable to find anything that shows she passes WP:GNG nor WP:JOURNALIST. Missvain (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Uncontroversially fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.